You recently asked me how being gay is any different from being straight
and single in the Church. Isn't it the same outcome? Lifelong celibacy?
We don't make exceptions for straight lifelong singles, so why should
we expect it for gays?
This is an important question. When we come across a new problem
that we haven't faced before, we like to look for analogous situations
which are easier to understand because we've confronted them before.
Then, we try to see how our well-understood problem's well-established
solutions might apply to the new problem. We apply the old script to the
new problem.
This is a pretty good measure because it gives us a framework for
dealing with novelty that draws on experience. It can be detrimental,
though, if it is applied mindlessly. For instance, we incarcerate
violent criminals (murderers, rapists) because we need to protect
ourselves from harm. Then we declared war on drugs and applied the same
punishment (incarceration) on people with drug addictions that we did on
violent criminals simply because we gave addicts the label "criminal."
Criminals go to jail. Therefore we should follow this script and lock
away addicts. We are now learning that there are subtle distinctions
between murderers and heroin users that may necessitate a more mindful,
rehabilitative approach for the latter. In fact, incarceration tends to
make addiction worse.
In a similar way, it's important to notice not only the
similarities between gay single Mormons and straight single Mormons, but
also the differences. Below are some of the differences that we may
find relevant:
When we talk about lifelong single straight Mormons (hereafter
LSSM), we are by-and-large talking about single sisters and not
brothers. There exist scripts in the Church for sisters who remain
single. We are to love and accept them as equal daughters of God,
knowing that many sisters do not marry through no fault of their own. We
are to have compassion (perhaps even pity) for the girl who hasn't yet
and perhaps never will find a husband. We have examples in the highest
echelons of Church leadership (Sheri Dew) of single women apparently
being unimpeded by their singledom. They are taught to find ways to
support marriage and family despite not having those blessings at this
time and always look forward to the possibility of it happening to them.
Some of these same elements may also be applied to lifelong single
brothers, but the more prevalent script is this: marriage is a
priesthood responsibility and there is no excuse for a man to remain
single. If a priesthood holder remains single it is his own fault. There
tends to be a culture of condemnation for unmarried men in the Church.
There are virtually no examples of single men in any prominent
leadership positions precisely because marriage is an explicit
prerequisite for all high-ranking priesthood callings. Male LSSMs tend
to be few and far between: disabled men and bachelor converts, each of
whom is still usually pressed toward marriage. The positive scripts we
have for LSSMs don't fit well on men even if they are straight.
Both gay and straight Mormon males face scrutiny and pressure due
to these expectations. For this reason, the Church may have a better
track record of retaining lesbians than gay men.
LSSMs can always hold onto hope for finding "the one" in the
future. Gay Mormons understand from adolescence that their chances of
marital bliss in the temple are slim. Hope is easily lost, even very
early in life. Living life without hope leads to depression.
LSSMs and gay Mormons both feel deep feelings of loneliness. LSSMs
often have an easier time connecting with people (romantically or
non-romantically) to fill that hole. Gay Mormons are burdened with a
secret that many people find repulsive (some LDS parents are guilty of
kicking their child out of their house when they learn he is gay).
Keeping it secret involves burdening themselves with shame and being
fearful to open up. These are added obstacles to forming fulfilling
non-romantic relationships. These obstacles tend to exacerbate their
feelings of loneliness.
Most LSSMs want a traditional heterosexual marriage. Some gay
Mormons might want it too, but have serious reservations and fears.
Others don't want it at all. To accept Mormonism as a gay person is to
accept that exaltation is a heavenly state that requires you to desire
and work toward something that you may not even want. (Many LDS women
can empathize with this plight vis-a-vis the doctrine that allows men to
have more than one wife).
If a LSSM finds love, she can be unreservedly excited. If a gay
Mormon finds love, he must either shove his feelings out or risk
apostasy (a.k.a. treason against the Church, a.k.a. being expelled from
one's native society). The stakes are high. Life is a constant high-wire
act. No other "disability" or deviation from the mainstream has such
stark ramifications. Blind and deaf people can enjoy full fellowship as
saints, even if they "act on" their disabilities.
For an LSSM, talking about their single situation may be an
ordinary conversation. For gay Mormons, the topic is fraught with
politics and rigid Church doctrine. Many see no point in discussing it
if there is no possible flexibility. It is what it is, and what it is is
wickedness -- end of story. It is difficult to volunteer to be
vulnerable in such tense discussions. They are rarely ordinary
conversations -- they can be highly destructive.
Typically LSSMs have options. For example, a woman may have a hard
time getting attention from the single LDS men in her area. She could,
if she chose, seek companionship from a non-Mormon man she finds
attractive and still retain good standing in the Church. Some might
argue that a mixed-faith marriage, even if it is not eternal, is better
and healthier than perpetual singleness. Gays in the Church have no
analogous options.
It may be true that the outcome for LSSMs and gay Mormons should be
the same: lifelong celibacy. Or perhaps looking at the differences
would lead us to believe otherwise. Whatever is the result, we ought to
be mindful of these differences and recognize when a script we apply to
one does or doesn't apply to the new situation.
My personal opinion is that LSSMs and gay Mormons are in quite
different situations and that it doesn't make sense to lump them
together.
No comments:
Post a Comment